Dirtiest Trials of the Twentieth Century   - The Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy

Reed Elsevier, as the richest and most influential publisher
in more than a hundred countries,
has won every battle it has fought in two decades.
When they decide it's time for dirty trials and lawyers, look out.
The ultimate in corporate and government corruption.


What court would ignore this?
Yet, this is the same federal judge who'd dismissed the case before!
Poof - $20,000,000-dollar per year company gone instantly!

What court would ignore this?
Yet, this is the same federal judge who'd dismissed the case before!
See and Believe       Trial Transcript       Poof - Gone!       Managing Directors!     Best & Brightest       Politics       WHAT??!!!         Dirty Jury?        PowerGems       See for yourself       Politics As Usual        Love Your Federal Judge         Dirtiest trial of the of the Twentieth Century       Victims? Not likely.       Membership of Managing Directors      Debra Benjamin      Cross Springer       Asking for Guilt       Dirty Jury?       Watstein - Watch this big-time con man pull it off in court     America's Best & Brightest       Main Page       Con THESE People?!!       Commentary       Censored      Masters and Millionaires

Dirtiest Trials of the of the Twentieth Century - Miscarriages of Justice

How rare it is to find a case that can offer not merely two or three, instead, more than a dozen major reasons for overturning that conviction.
Here is a case studied by a respected federal judge for many months, who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case.

Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the single richest and most powerful publisher in more than one hundred countries around the world,
easily. empirically and truthfully described as one of the most corrupt corporations in all of human history,
perverted the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash, power, and perqs.

Imagine a trial where not ten percent of the proceedings have ANY connection with most of the defendants.
That alone should require a separation of trial. In this case, NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings,
accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants.

The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant,
and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman."

For days and days and weeks and weeks, all the discussion was about Gordon and his actions.
Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, yet,
this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study,
was under one of the worst pressures any judge can be subjected to:
pressure from the federal court of appeals above him, who, in
New York's bailiwick, remains under the control of....
Reed Elsevier, the most powerful force today
in the American arena of jurisprudence.

This can be fixed by Presidential Pardon.
Call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.